This is a difficult summary to write because you really can't summarize anything. It's all "well if this happens then they could do that but if that happens then they'd maybe do this..." Everything is conditional. But the reason I'm writing out my thoughts is because I think there's a larger context that is also in play.
As any fan paying attention can sort out for themselves, there are basically three paths:
1. They come out of the break hot and end up .500 or better by the end of the month.
2. They continue to collapse and are 10, 12 games under by the end of the month.
3. They revert back to what they did for a month to get back to .500 (18-12, .600) which would leave them 3 games under on the morning of August 2.
In the first case they buy, in the second case they just write it off and sell, in the third they likely do a little of both. But the other context is that looking forward to '27 (as Ross Atkins WILL do) a lot of the roster is fixed already which limits the ability to improve the team apart from internal improvements (Vlad, Kirk, etc).
Working through the lineup, you can see the problem. Next year's catchers are this year's catchers (which should be a good thing). Next year's starting infield is, barring the incredibly fortunate possibility of getting some other sucker to take Giminez's contract, will be the same four guys and the reserve is flexible but not the position you look to for a big upgrade. The DH, if Springer isn't brought back, will almost certainly be (expected to be) Anthony Santander. If healthy they will try to play him, they won't write off that contract casually.
That leaves outfield as the only real opportunity for external offensive upgrade. They have to assume Barger is the presumptive RF, and they'll have Lukes and Straw (yes they will exercise his option) in reserve. They have, in house, a number of possible but replaceable LF options - Sanchez, Pinango, Schreck, Clase. But the first two are very bad defenders and not yet enough of a hitter to justify having a lock on the position. The others largely untested at all. Center is an issue because Varsho has suddenly become an ordinary defender which means he need to bring above average offense - which he might...or might not. But the free agent options beyond him for center field are pretty bleak. The upshot is that whether they are adding a month from now with '27 in mind, or considering off-season upgrades (which would presumably come after the lockout is resolved) it will take considerable skill.
Behold
If you wisely assume that Acuna gets his option picked up, there's no upgrade on Varsho there (Grisham is something of a wash) and no offensive savior beyond Arozerena and Suzuki. When half or more of the teams in baseball are hungry for a good RH hitter.
So Ross is out there this month trying to figure out if the trade market can solve either of those problems.
On the pitching staff, the rotation is kind of wide open in theory. There are three guys whose names are written in ink - Cease, Yesavage, and Ponce - and barring a big injury, Spencer Miles has a big leg up on one of the others. That leaves one slot, which won't be Berrios because he'll miss most or all of '27. They might bring back Gausman if he doesn't retire and after that it's about depth. The have, if healthy, Francis, Bloss, Dallas, Tiedemann, Perry and Stanifer in line and close. That's good but one presumes they'd like something more than a TJ recovery and five rookies. The implication here is that Atkins would love to add a pitcher with control beyond this year (as he would with hitters) which thins the market again.
The Marlins can't defend trading Alcantara while they're hot. The Twins don't seem on a path to sell off so Ryan may not be out there. KC is going nowhere but they just extended Waca, I don't think they want to move him. That leaves Reid Detmers and, less appealingly, Jose Soriano with the Angels who are notoriously clingy about keeping guys they could get value for. Detmers has 2 more years of control and I'll bet that if you really knew, Atkins would rather acquire him than Skubal this summer. Of course there are other options for this year who are pending free agents but those have no implications for '27. I think the Jays would go pretty hard on Detmers even if they were otherwise selling.
The bullpen to me is fascinating from a trade deadline perspective because if they are adding at all, Atkins always adds relievers at the deadline (unless they are way out like in '24). The thing is - there's not much room. There are the five core guys that have been, in most cases, overused - Varland, Hoffman, Rogers, Fisher, and Fluharty - plus Spencer Miles and there's six of eight spots spoken for. Three of those can technically be optioned but seem unlikely to be. Tommy Nance doesn't. He might get flipped but he's not just gonna be cut so there's seven. That leaves Corbin who they very well might just let him go, so there's room to add one, but two? Not unless there's an injury. If you did add a guy who can't be optioned you've already filled most of your '27 'pen.
Not that the bullpen needs to get better, as of right now, but bullpens are notoriously unpredictable. Point of all these many words is that there's WAY more room for Vlad, Kirk, Barger and Santander to improve the offense as any outside addition, and if Atkins did land a guy with control next year, there's not THAT much flexibility with the primary rotation (yes, I know how they are living out the "never have too much pitching" dream this year).
No comments:
Post a Comment